2 KINGS 5:1-14
Naaman, commander
of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man and in high favor with his
master, because by him the LORD had given victory to Aram. The man, though a
mighty warrior, suffered from leprosy. Now
the Arameans on one of their raids had taken a young girl captive from the land
of Israel, and she served Naaman's wife. She said to her mistress, "If only my
lord were with the prophet who is in Samaria! He would cure him of his
leprosy." So Naaman went in and told his lord just
what the girl from the land of Israel had said. And the king of Aram said, "Go then,
and I will send along a letter to the king of Israel."
He went, taking
with him ten talents of silver, six thousand shekels of gold, and ten sets of
garments. He brought the letter to the king of
Israel, which read, "When this letter reaches you, know that I have sent
to you my servant Naaman, that you may cure him of his leprosy." When the king of Israel read the letter, he
tore his clothes and said, "Am I God, to give death or life, that this man
sends word to me to cure a man of his leprosy? Just look and see how he is
trying to pick a quarrel with me."
But when Elisha
the man of God heard that the king of Israel had torn his clothes, he sent a
message to the king, "Why have you torn your clothes? Let him come to me,
that he may learn that there is a prophet in Israel." So Naaman came with his horses and
chariots, and halted at the entrance of Elisha's house. Elisha sent a messenger to him, saying,
"Go, wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall be restored and
you shall be clean." But
Naaman became angry and went away, saying, "I thought that for me he would
surely come out, and stand and call on the name of the LORD his God, and would
wave his hand over the spot, and cure the leprosy! Are not Abana and Pharpar, the rivers of
Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? Could I not wash in them, and
be clean?" He turned and went away in a rage. But his servants approached and said to
him, "Father, if the prophet had commanded you to do something difficult,
would you not have done it? How much more, when all he said to you was, 'Wash,
and be clean'?" So
he went down and immersed himself seven times in the Jordan, according to the
word of the man of God; his flesh was restored like the flesh of a young boy,
and he was clean.
This is the Word of the Lord.
I used to work for a man who said, “People who say ‘money isn’t
everything’ obviously don’t have money.”
Today’s Old Testament reading would seem to speak against that idea.
Naaman had money, lots of it. He had power, fame, and
authority, he had the king’s ear, he had servants, and he even had an army at
his beck and call.
What Naaman did not
have was his health. Honestly, we don’t know what Naaman’s illness was. “Tzaraath,” which our reading translates
as “leprosy,” was a term used interchangeably for skin diseases of all kinds,
as well as for mildew in clothing and houses. Its possible root word may
translate as “smiting,” because it was seen as a punishment for sin.
Whatever Naaman had, it was bad. Bad because it not only
affected his health, it was a visible sign to all those who saw him that,
mighty and rich though he may be, he was vulnerable. Folks like Naaman saw
vulnerability as weakness, and people who command armies cannot be seen as
weak.
I imagine that Naaman tried everything money could buy to
cure the leprosy – arsenic and elephant’s teeth and creosote and mercury are
listed among the historical treatments, not to mention the gifts and sacrifices
he must have made to his gods… and nothing helped. Day by day the disease
spread. If it was indeed the disease we know today as leprosy, or Hansen’s
Disease, his nerve endings would be affected, causing numbness, and his skin
would have developed lesions.
Now, I admit freely that sometimes my imagination gets away
from me, but I can’t help thinking that, at his core, Naaman, great and
terrifying commander of the greatest of the Syrian armies, was a nice guy. His
name translates as “pleasantness,” after all. He must have been kind to his
servants, because even a girl his troops captured on one of their raids on
Israel, a young lady forced to be a slave to Naaman’s wife, worried about his
health. “If only my lord were with
the prophet who is in Samaria,” she said to Naaman’s wife, “He would cure him
of his leprosy.”
And Naaman's wife told him, and he told the king... and I think we have a little telephone game going on here,
because by the time word got to the guy who wrote the King of Aram’s letters,
it sounded like the King of Israel was the one who did the leprosy curing.
This, as you might imagine, freaked Joram, the King of
Israel, out. He threw a King-sized tantrum, flailing about and tearing his clothes
and fretting that old Ben-Hadad II, the King of Aram, was looking for an excuse
for all-out war, which Israel would lose again.
Then he got a message from the prophet in question, Elisha:
“Cool it, dude. Send him to me.”
I bet it was a sight, Naaman and all his horses and
chariots and carts of silver and gold and clothing, armor flashing in the
sunlight, standards waving majestically in the breeze, foot soldiers stamping
out a mighty cadence, marching and rumbling down this dirt road in Samaria,
pulling up in a cloud of pomp and circumstance and dust to the door of a mud
hut.
Naaman dismounts his chariot and stands at attention,
awaiting the greeting of this mighty prophet, ready for a dazzling display of
metaphysical pyrotechnics and is met by…
…a servant. Some lowly slave boy with a message from the
boss, a directive to do something utterly demeaning and ridiculous: “Go, wash in the Jordan seven times, and
your flesh shall be restored and you shall be clean.”
This was be the equivalent of writing a carefully crafted,
painstakingly detailed text message to someone who replies, “K.”
It was Naaman’s turn to throw a tantrum now. How dare he! Doesn’t
he know who I am? There are better rivers at home, why can’t I go dip there
instead of this nasty little creek? I wanted a big to-do, invocations and intonations
and gesticulations and all that stuff – shouldn’t there be lightning and whirlwinds
and bright lights and an orchestra in the background when miracles are done?
And again it is servants who speak reason to Naaman,
saying, in effect, “I love you, but you’re being kinda stupid.”
If he had told you to do something complicated, you’d have
done it, right? He could have sent you on one of those Monty Python “bring me a
shrubbery” quests, and you’d have jumped at it, and you know it. You love those
things. All he is saying is go dip in the Jordan, no big deal, just go do it,
what can it hurt?
And I know it is just my imagination but I can see Naaman
doing an eye-roll like a fourteen-year-old, saying, “all right, gosh!” and stomping off to the Jordan in a pout. His army
and his servants and his horses and his chariots all follow behind him and line
up on the banks of the river to watch him. He dips once, twice, three times… “nothing’s
happening,” he complains, and one of his servants shouts, “keep going!” Four
times, five times… “I’m getting water up my nose!” “Don’t stop yet!” “But...” “Keep
going, sir!” “Gah! All right!” Six
times, and the seventh… and every person on the army simultaneously gasps.
Naaman is healed. Spectacularly, unquestionably, completely
healed. Not as good as new, better than new.
Our reading doesn’t include this, but Naaman returns to
Elisha and thanks him and begs him to take the gold and silver and clothing as
payment for the healing, which Elisha refuses.
What does happen, though, is that Naaman takes back two
donkey-loads of dirt, so he can have Israeli ground to sacrifice to the God of
Israel, who he will alone worship from that day forward.
There are so many lessons in this account, so many things
we can apply…
First off, of course, Naaman didn't get what he wanted – he
didn't get the recognition and respect he felt like he deserved, he didn't get
a floor show, but he got what he needed.
And for crying out loud, Naaman certainly didn't deserve
his healing! He worshiped false gods, he fought against Israel, he whined and
complained the whole dadgum time he was being healed about the way he was being healed – but in the end
he did it anyway, and God healed him anyway.
And isn't it interesting that, for all the rich and powerful
and influential people in the story, all the kings and generals and armies and all
their horses and chariots and silver and gold, the ones who made the difference,
were exactly the ones with no power – a slave girl, some servants and a prophet’s
messenger boy?
We know, you and I, that God doesn't often do things the
way we expect. God comes in the backdoor of history, putting babies in mangers
and kings on crosses, healing and forgiving and loving based not on who
deserves it, based not upon who the one loved is, but based upon who God is.
And though we may at times feel powerless, it is a fact
that the rich and powerful of our world rarely change things. Revolutions don’t
happen in the halls of government, but at the kitchen table, and those are just
the revolutions that change temporary things. Nations and governments and
empires and kingdoms come and they go, after all.
The revolutions that count,
the ones that change eternity, where a human being loved by God responds with
joy to that love, these revolutions happen
in soup kitchens bus station waiting rooms and storefront churches as often as
they happen in megachurches and cathedrals, and I daresay more often.
We may feel as if we have no voice, but we are called to
speak. We may not like the messenger but we are called to listen. We may not
like the method but we are called to go and to do.
And we may not see the lightning or feel the earth move or
hear angels singing or even get the credit for what is done, but when we are
faithful – and I mean faithful even in the way Naaman was faithful, doing what
God required with the same attitude as a kid being sent to his room without
supper – even then, God is faithful, and things change.
Amen and Amen.
Another good message. Simpler than most, but straightforward. Made me smile.
ReplyDeleteOf course, I'm a sucker for a good Monty Python reference. :)